<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for IRENIC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irenic.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irenic.org.uk</link>
	<description>Interfaith consultancy based in Falkirk, Scotland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:35:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What place do people of faith have at Occupy Everywhere? by Claudette Burns</title>
		<link>http://irenic.org.uk/2011/10/what-place-do-people-of-faith-have-at-occupy-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-13081</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudette Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irenic.org.uk/?p=2311#comment-13081</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read this a couple of time, i&#039;m not sure what I&#039;m suppose to take away from it. Is there a &quot;user&quot; friendly version so I can comprehend what this is about. I know I not stupid, but I don&#039;t understand your point. Please help me understand.I truly believe that all religions can work together and have a place in our lives. I do not believe that there is one single perfect one especially since history tells us that religious writing have been translated by &quot;men&quot; so the twist is in the translator. Maybe I&#039;m way off base, but you peak my interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read this a couple of time, i&#8217;m not sure what I&#8217;m suppose to take away from it. Is there a &#8220;user&#8221; friendly version so I can comprehend what this is about. I know I not stupid, but I don&#8217;t understand your point. Please help me understand.I truly believe that all religions can work together and have a place in our lives. I do not believe that there is one single perfect one especially since history tells us that religious writing have been translated by &#8220;men&#8221; so the twist is in the translator. Maybe I&#8217;m way off base, but you peak my interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What place do people of faith have at Occupy Everywhere? by Jonathan Oskins</title>
		<link>http://irenic.org.uk/2011/10/what-place-do-people-of-faith-have-at-occupy-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-13031</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Oskins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irenic.org.uk/?p=2311#comment-13031</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing this. I would love any feedback you have. Have a great day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing this. I would love any feedback you have. Have a great day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on International Golden Rule Day &#8211; 5 April by admin</title>
		<link>http://irenic.org.uk/2011/04/international-golden-rule-day-5-april/comment-page-1/#comment-7183</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irenic.org.uk/?p=1678#comment-7183</guid>
		<description>Thanks , Sohaib.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks , Sohaib.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on International Golden Rule Day &#8211; 5 April by Sohaib</title>
		<link>http://irenic.org.uk/2011/04/international-golden-rule-day-5-april/comment-page-1/#comment-7082</link>
		<dc:creator>Sohaib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irenic.org.uk/?p=1678#comment-7082</guid>
		<description>I compiled a detailed paper on the Golden Rule from an Islamic perspective, which you can consult here:
http://dialogic.ws/2010/07/10/a-golden-approach-to-dialogue/
Best wishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I compiled a detailed paper on the Golden Rule from an Islamic perspective, which you can consult here:<br />
<a href="http://dialogic.ws/2010/07/10/a-golden-approach-to-dialogue/" rel="nofollow">http://dialogic.ws/2010/07/10/a-golden-approach-to-dialogue/</a><br />
Best wishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Egypt, Tunisia and the youth revolt in the Middle East by admin</title>
		<link>http://irenic.org.uk/2011/01/egypt-tunisia-and-the-youth-revolt-in-the-middle-east/comment-page-1/#comment-6420</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irenic.org.uk/?p=1313#comment-6420</guid>
		<description>The typo was in the original article.  I&#039;ve corrected it now.  Thanks for drawing it to my attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The typo was in the original article.  I&#8217;ve corrected it now.  Thanks for drawing it to my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Egypt, Tunisia and the youth revolt in the Middle East by me</title>
		<link>http://irenic.org.uk/2011/01/egypt-tunisia-and-the-youth-revolt-in-the-middle-east/comment-page-1/#comment-6123</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 02:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irenic.org.uk/?p=1313#comment-6123</guid>
		<description>hi nice speech but i want you to know  that you made a mistake in ur writting .in fact it was young people who chased Ben ali not Ben ami .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi nice speech but i want you to know  that you made a mistake in ur writting .in fact it was young people who chased Ben ali not Ben ami .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mary Unites Christians and Muslims by admin</title>
		<link>http://irenic.org.uk/2011/01/mary-unites-christians-and-muslims/comment-page-1/#comment-5558</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irenic.org.uk/?p=1287#comment-5558</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Mike.  This is an extract from an article in the Roman Catholic news service, Zenit.  IRENIC is merely an interfaith news digest, bringing to its readers attention articles from a number of disparate sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Mike.  This is an extract from an article in the Roman Catholic news service, Zenit.  IRENIC is merely an interfaith news digest, bringing to its readers attention articles from a number of disparate sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mary Unites Christians and Muslims by Mike Glover</title>
		<link>http://irenic.org.uk/2011/01/mary-unites-christians-and-muslims/comment-page-1/#comment-5431</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Glover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irenic.org.uk/?p=1287#comment-5431</guid>
		<description>Your statement of the Christian point of view of Mary is very sweeping.  In fact the position of many Christians is what you describe as the Muslim point of view.  There is no one &#039;Christian&#039; point of view about many things, and care needs to be taken that this impression is not given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your statement of the Christian point of view of Mary is very sweeping.  In fact the position of many Christians is what you describe as the Muslim point of view.  There is no one &#8216;Christian&#8217; point of view about many things, and care needs to be taken that this impression is not given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christians &#8216;less devout&#8217; than Muslims in Britain by admin</title>
		<link>http://irenic.org.uk/2011/01/christians-less-devout-than-muslims-in-britain/comment-page-1/#comment-5277</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irenic.org.uk/?p=1317#comment-5277</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, Sheila.  Some of the articles that I pass on are stories that point to good interfaith practices - others are examples of some of the crazy things journalists sometimes write.  This clearly is one of the latter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Sheila.  Some of the articles that I pass on are stories that point to good interfaith practices &#8211; others are examples of some of the crazy things journalists sometimes write.  This clearly is one of the latter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christians &#8216;less devout&#8217; than Muslims in Britain by Sheila Brain</title>
		<link>http://irenic.org.uk/2011/01/christians-less-devout-than-muslims-in-britain/comment-page-1/#comment-5241</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irenic.org.uk/?p=1317#comment-5241</guid>
		<description>What a crazy and deliberately misleading use of statistics! What the survey actually says is that of the 82% of the population acknowledging a religion, 72% nominally label themselves as &quot;Christian&quot; (as opposed to any other religion) and that of those 72%, as many as 32% say that they &quot;actively practice&quot; - (i.e. actually go to church). If this is true, then that represents over 10 million people who claim to &quot;actively practice&quot; their christian faith - a much higher statistic than is usually assumed by the churches themselves!!!   Good news! 

But to start the article by claiming that the 72% are &quot;churchgoers&quot; (as opposed to the actual 32% of those who are so) is an outright misrepresentation of the survey findings - which says no such thing. And nowhere does it use the term &quot;devout&quot; as in the newspaper headline. 

Of course, this does not alter the fact that the survey reports that nominal Christians appear to be less &quot;active&quot;  than those of other religions - which comes as no great surprise.  However, of course, they have fallen into the classic trap of not comparing like with like..... forgetting that if you ask people for their religion then they will just tick the box &quot;christian&quot; because they happen to live within a traditionally christian culture, despite the fact that the majority do not have a clue what &quot;religion&quot; or &quot;christian&quot; really means!  If, instead of asking the question &quot;do you have a religion&quot; they asked &quot;are you religious?&quot;, I guess it would produce a very different result - and then you would  be justified in asking if they &quot;actively practice&quot; it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a crazy and deliberately misleading use of statistics! What the survey actually says is that of the 82% of the population acknowledging a religion, 72% nominally label themselves as &#8220;Christian&#8221; (as opposed to any other religion) and that of those 72%, as many as 32% say that they &#8220;actively practice&#8221; &#8211; (i.e. actually go to church). If this is true, then that represents over 10 million people who claim to &#8220;actively practice&#8221; their christian faith &#8211; a much higher statistic than is usually assumed by the churches themselves!!!   Good news! </p>
<p>But to start the article by claiming that the 72% are &#8220;churchgoers&#8221; (as opposed to the actual 32% of those who are so) is an outright misrepresentation of the survey findings &#8211; which says no such thing. And nowhere does it use the term &#8220;devout&#8221; as in the newspaper headline. </p>
<p>Of course, this does not alter the fact that the survey reports that nominal Christians appear to be less &#8220;active&#8221;  than those of other religions &#8211; which comes as no great surprise.  However, of course, they have fallen into the classic trap of not comparing like with like&#8230;.. forgetting that if you ask people for their religion then they will just tick the box &#8220;christian&#8221; because they happen to live within a traditionally christian culture, despite the fact that the majority do not have a clue what &#8220;religion&#8221; or &#8220;christian&#8221; really means!  If, instead of asking the question &#8220;do you have a religion&#8221; they asked &#8220;are you religious?&#8221;, I guess it would produce a very different result &#8211; and then you would  be justified in asking if they &#8220;actively practice&#8221; it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

